Just over 10 years ago our new, well newish, prime minister Mr Blair delivered perhaps his most famous soundbite of all. When asked what his three priorities in government were he replied: ‘Education, education, education’.
Since then, the soundbite has been backed up with hard cash by the Labour government: measured between 1997 and the end of the last academic year, the core "per pupil" funding has risen by 48 per cetn in real terms - or £1,450 more per year per child. By the end of this academic year, it will be a 55 per cent increase. Yet despite this considerable spike in capital investment from the government, standards have refused to show a commensurate improvement. The government aims for 60 per cent of pupils to leave school at 16 with 5 A-C grrades at GCSE: in 2007 45.1 per cent of pupils were ending compulsory education with these qualifications - up from 35.6 per cent in 1997, but still some way below target.
So, we have a government still wrestling with the thorny subject of how to drive up standards in schools.
This serves as some background for the announcement by schools minister Jim Knight that technology and its potential was going to be the latest weapon deployed to tackle educational disadvantage. The traditional school report is to be replaced by an electronic version delivered by email and consumer electronics, such as computers and mobile phones, should be used to give parents information about their children's school work. The minister said this would give parents access to "frequently-updated information on children's achievement, progress, attendance, behaviour and special needs wherever, whenever they want, using password-protected, secure, online systems".
There all sorts of potential pitfalls to such an idea and the government is precariously positioned at the moment to embark upon such a large scale and ambitious IT project. This is to say nothing of the opposition from the powerful teaching unions who have predictably, if understandably, voiced concerns about teachers’ workloads as well as ‘Big Brother’ style privacy concerns.
However, and I say this as a former teacher, the chance to provide real-time feedback to parents and students on performance and areas of improvement could make an immeasurable difference in underachieving schools. Letting students know where they’re at and what they need to do to improve is an essential cornerstone of helping progression. Sharing this information with parents, some of whom Knight characterises as "hard to reach", could make all the difference.
This is really is convergence in action as information flows freely from a number of sources across networks to a number of devices. Parents can already receive an automatically generated text message sent by an attendance register at school if their child is inexplicably absent. Imagine what the affect would be of both child and parent receiving a text message on a Friday afternoon with the previous week's grades and next week's attainment targets contained.
This is a remarkably bold and progressive move by the minister – unions have raised a sceptical eyebrow and greeted it "cautiously". If even the bare bones of it come into effect in schools, it will be a lasting and worthy legacy to 10 years of investment.
By Sam Ingleby
Recent Comments